And that player isSurvivor: Game Changerschamp Sarah Lacina.
What is Sarahs idea?
Let her explain it.
Robert Voets/CBS
Nobody gets voted out, but you get votedagainst, says Sarah.
What Sarah is essentially proposing is that every episode still have a Tribal Council with regular voting.
Nobody gets voted out, however.
Everybody goes down and they write, and Jeff doesnt read the votes.
So you could be lying and saying, Oh, I voted for this person, or that person.
Everybody is jockeying for a spot and it would just be nasty.
After being told how evil her plan is… Sarah smiles even more!
It would be [evil], and you would have no idea where youre at.
You could be sitting there going, I have zero votes, and you have, like, 50!
It would be so heartbreaking at the end to see how many votes you had every time or something.
Sarah was already envisioning how it could have played out forWinners at War.
Everybody knows that nobodys going home.
And if you find an idol or something, then that eliminates one of your votes.
I was so impressed by Sarahs idea that I told her I would bring it directly to Probst.
That would be called The Sarah Idol.
So, a 10 vote eraser.
So whatdoesthe host think of Sarahs idea?
As promised, I asked him.
Heres what Probst has to say about the pitch.
I love this idea of asking players for new twists or new approaches to the game!
Its an interesting idea!
So, all of our storytelling is either directly or indirectly related to that dramatic question.
You might have to add other layers where the audience knows more than the players.
They know what the players dont.
And you could add in the kinds of twists that allow players to erase history as Sarah suggested!
Things that keep the game undecided until the very end.
Its a fun idea and I can see how you could do it.
With Sarah returning to play again!
But it also could be a fun experiment to try.
So what say you,SurvivorNation?
What doyouthink of Sarahs idea?
